-
KevlingPosted: 21/12/2009 Posts: 5 Member since: 18/12/2009
Warning - Post contains spoiler information!
Episode one made you think about the conversations you'd had when you picked the culprit, but for episode two, the summary that showed you the four suspects had the blinking statue of Prometheus in shot! Mere decode after saying "was there a difference in the butcher's description of the stolen objects and tha of Lady Snobbish?" before pretty much showing you the answer in the next frame!
In fact it was so obvious my wife was convinced it was a red herring, or a plant by the real culprit...
Or was it just us? -
KevlingPosted: 21/12/2009 Posts: 5 Member since: 18/12/2009
Sorry "decode" was supposed to say "seconds" (stupid iPhone) -
JamesB_RSPosted: 22/12/2009 Posts: 184 Member since: 24/09/2009
Warning - Post contains spoiler information!
That's interesting to hear Kevling, the first episode was obviously very much about listening for the facts whereas the second one was more visual. You mentioned about your wife thinking this was a red herring, this was intentional to make people doubt themselves. Glad to hear it worked!
We love hearing feedback because some of the next episodes are still under construction so the information you give really helps us. Thanks! -
tomsauPosted: 23/12/2009 Posts: 5 Member since: 19/12/2009
Warning - Post contains spoiler information!
My first instinct was moss. but i also thought it was a red herring :P I also thought that there's no way it'd be the butcher after they made it so blindingly obvious to look for a difference in item descriptions... I can't remember who i chose :( but I think I got it wrong :PJamesB_RSPosted: 22/12/2009
That's interesting to hear Kevling, the first episode was obviously very much about listening for the facts whereas the second one was more visual. You mentioned about your wife thinking this was a red herring, this was intentional to make people doubt themselves. Glad to hear it worked!
We love hearing feedback because some of the next episodes are still under construction so the information you give really helps us. Thanks! -
KlezzonPosted: 28/12/2009 Posts: 19 Member since: 28/12/2009
I Agree with Kevling.
That was a bit too obvious even for a red herring.
I hope to see harder solution next time. -
PaulWPosted: 29/12/2009 Posts: 4 Member since: 30/09/2009
Thanks for the feedback Klezzon. We're still learning what does and doesn't work. I hope you'll find the next episode's solution a bit more interesting.KlezzonPosted: 28/12/2009
I Agree with Kevling.
That was a bit too obvious even for a red herring.
I hope to see harder solution next time. -
YorenzoPosted: 05/01/2010 Posts: 1 Member since: 05/01/2010
I agree with everybody, the answer was really too easy.
It looks like "this car is red" "what color is the car ?"
I hope to see an hardest level next time.
PS : I think it's a pity that "Blue Toad Mystery Files : The Mysteries of Little Riddle" is only an english game. It deserves to be in other languages ! But i think it's also Sony fault.
Episode two solution was too easy!
are trademarks or registered trademarks of Sony Computer Entertainment Inc. All Rights Reserved.